IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research

Print ISSN: 2581-9356

Online ISSN: 2581-9364

CODEN : IIJOCV

IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research (IJODR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 533

PDF Downloaded: 695


Get Permission Sheoran, Sadiq, Hussain, Gupta, Ulla, and Manzoor: Three dimensional technique of imaging in orthodontics: A review


Introduction

In the field of orthodontics it requires careful acquisition as well as proper interpretation of information to achieve proper diagnosis and treatment planning accordingly. Three dimensional imaging plays an important aspect of diagnosis as well as treatment of various oral disorders. Three dimensional imaging provides faster as well as efficient ability of analysis. This 21st century has been known as the digital era of the dentistry with respect to dental imaging.1 Now a days CAD CAM processing of the prosthesis is very much common as it requires very less time for the fabrication of the prosthesis and the prosthesis being fabricated from the cad cam process is highly esthetic. So CAD diagnosis make the use of imaging techniques three dimensional along with three dimensional image processing tools.2 Three dimensional imaging technique makes the things very much easier to use, reliable and economical. Among all the different investigatory procedures, the best among the all is three dimensional imaging technique in orthodontics to document dimension and attain the exact information of the anatomy of the alveolar bone or different structures in the craniofacial region.3 However the depth of obtaining the craniofacial structures is not possible exactly with the use of static two dimensional imaging technology.4 The recent three dimensional machine is quite biologically friendly as compared to static two dimensional imaging process as it utilizes very less ionizing radiation as compared to the radiation processed by cephalograms and other panaromic views in contrast to other things with the use of three dimensional imaging one can get detailed information with very much less radiation exposure to the patient.5

Three dimensional imaging technique uses in a row of series and is congregated with the help of high technology advanced equipment which is managed with the help of a computer to check the misapprehension with respect to deepness of the anatomical structure.3 Imaging of hard tissue, soft tissue and teeth and tooth structure plays an important role in treatment planning of the orthodontic treatment.6 So imaging at these particular site acts as an therapeutic diagnostic tool for the clinician to determine the orthodontic treatment outcome.7

Drawbacks of two-dimensional imaging

  1. External error known as radiographic projection error is associated with the use of two dimensional technique in association with size, magnification, distortion of the image, positioning of the patient, distortion related to projection.

  2. Low accuracy and precision with respect to manual data collection as well as processing.

  3. Ill-defined outlines, hard edges.

  4. Difficulty in location of land marks.

Three dimensionanl imaging

It uses voxel, which is the smallest element of the three dimensional image. The volume of a voxel is thought to be a three dimensional array of the images that are bitmapped with the each voxel having height, width and thickness. There are different types of geometric strategies for the measurements to be in three dimension, most common is

i) Measurement by triangulation: This system viewed the object basically from two positions in the space and simultaneously captured the images from both the positions over the film or over some digital medium that too in rapid succession. The three-dimensional measuring system should be capable enough to identify the identical anatomical land mark at three different position.

If there is greater separation between the two images of the x-ray sources, it would be more difficult in identification of the same landmark in the two images.

In literature, it was found that there are two different methods of producing study models digital i.e. i) by the process of non-destructive imaging:- it utilizes structured light, laser light, x-ray to the image while leaving the original cast intact. And the ii) is by the process of destructive imaging:- helps in removing the parts of the cast when it is being imaged.

Various uses of digital study models

  1. No chances of breakage of the model.

  2. No need to store the model for future reference

  3. Immediately retrieval of the data

  4. Easy to communicate with the laboratory for any reference or change.

  5. Changes to the digital model can be made through e-mail.

Different disadvantages of digital study model

  1. There is no tactile input from the dentist.

  2. These digital models can not be articulated virtually with reference to the patient temporomandibular joint.

  3. Requires time to learn the procedure.

Various methods that produces three dimensional imaging are as follows

  1. Computed tomography: The devices that used for computed tomography are basically divided in to two groups i.e. cone beam and the other is fan beam. In the conventional fan beam the x-ray source and frame metal rotate around the firstly in the horizontal manner computed tomography scanner works. The patient is being positioned over the table, through the center point of the machine the table moves. With respect to computed tomography some of the anatomical structures seem to be higher with in the image.8 Some of the dis advantages with respect to computed tomography are, expensive, distant lesions can be missed, chances of artifact formation, when compared to different soft tissue imaging system the data acquired by computed tomography is quite insufficient. 9

  2. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): Cone beam computed tomography was basically designed to over come the short comings of computed tomography technique. 10 Cone beam computed tomography comes with a lot of difference from computed tomography in reference to positioning of the patient, scan period, amount of radiation emission as well as resolution. 11 With the help of cone beam computed tomography technique, all the volumetric data that too with small exposure of radiation can be achieved with single exposure. 12 Literature revealed that the radiation dose that is achieved from computed tomography is 15 times more than the dosage of cone beam computed tomography and as well as approximate dosage that is achieved from cone beam computed tomography is equals to 12 panaromic radiographic dose. 11, 13, 14 In orthodontics data can be obtained as a self determining solution from different craniofacial areas.9

Cone beam computed tomography can be helpful in orthodontics in terms of

  1. Identifying the anatomy whether it is typical or atypical.

  2. Identifying length of the root as well as alignment.

  3. Measure the distance of the teeth in between the jaws.

  4. Discrepancy between arch size and teeth can be examined.

  5. Relationship of maxilla to the mandible in three dimension.

  6. Determining the exact position of the impacted tooth in the jaw.

Benefits of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics

  1. Less expensive as compared to conventional computed tomography.

  2. Less maintenance value of cone beam computed tomography.

  3. Decreased dosage of radiation as compared to computed tomography.

  4. With the use of cone beam computed tomography all the information can be achieved in single exposure.

Disadvantages

  1. Occurrence of artifacts with metal brackets or with restoration over the tooth.

  2. Unable to make images of soft tissues.

  3. Distortion of the image.15

Three dimensional laser scanning

It is used in capturing the facial morphology as well as morphology of the soft tissue. It is a non-invasive technique of tissue imaging. The validity of this technique has been confirmed by various researchers. 16, 17 Accurate three dimensional facial models can be fabricated from this technique.18 As compared to cone beam computed tomography it is less expensive.

Scanning technique based on vision

These are basically non-invasive technique of three dimensional imaging. The different techniques that utilizes vision based scanning includes moire topography, stereo photogrammetery which is basically used in orthodontics.

Four dimensional imaging technique

It includes basically documentation of the facial movements dynamically and modify the dynamics of expressions of the face. Facial expression and dynamic in facial motion with or without repaired cleft lip using video stereophotogrammetry has been studied. This technique reduces unnecessary and unavoidable complications therefore help in improving the prognosis of the treatment.

Conclusion

Three dimensional imaging procedure plays a vital role in determing and prognosis of the orthodontic treatment. It also reduces the chair side time of the dentist as well as the patient. Although evidence‑ based guidelines for 3D imaging is still needed to get it into commonplace dentistry.

Source of Funding

No financial support was received for the work within this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1 

S C White D C Yoon S Tetradis Digital Radiography in Dentistry: What It Should Do for You?J Calif Dent Assoc19992794252

2 

AS Ogodescu C Sinescu EA Ogodescu M Negrutiu E Bratu Digital Tools in The Interdisciplinary Orthodontic Treatment of Adult PatientsInt J Biol Biomed Eng2010497105

3 

L M Finlay Craniometry and cephalometry: A history prior to the advent of radiographyAngle Orthod19805031221

4 

MY Hajeer DT Millett AF Ayoub JP Siebert Current Products and PracticesJ Orthod 2004311627010.1179/146531204225011346

5 

L M Finlay Craniometry and cephalometry: A history prior to the advent of radiographyAngle Orthod19805031221

6 

JM Plooij TJ Maal P Haers WA Borstlap AM Kuijpers-Jagtman SJ Bergé Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic reviewInt J Oral Maxillofac Surg20114043415210.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.013

7 

ME Mavili HI Canter B Saglam-Aydinatay S Kamaci I Kocadereli Use of Three-Dimensional Medical Modeling Methods for Precise Planning of Orthognathic SurgeryJ Craniofac Surg 2007184740710.1097/scs.0b013e318069014f

8 

CA Aboudara D Hatcher IL Nielsen A Miller A three-dimensional evaluation of the upper airway in adolescentsOrthod Craniofac Res 200361173510.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.253.x

9 

A Harorli M Akgul S Dagistan Radiology in Dentistry2006Ataturk University Press

10 

DJ Halazonetis From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scansAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop200512756273710.1016/j.ajodo.2005.01.004

11 

CH Kau S Richmond JM Palomo MG Hans Current Products and PracticeJ Orthod 20053242829310.1179/146531205225021285

12 

S C White Cone beam imaging in dentistryHealth Phys20089562837

13 

WC Scarfe AG Farman P Sukovic Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental practiceJ Can Dent Assoc2006727580

14 

K Tsiklakis C Donta S Gavala K Karayianni V Kamenopoulou CJ Hourdakis Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CTEur J Radiol 2005563413710.1016/j.ejrad.2005.05.011

15 

OH Karatas E Toy Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature reviewEur J Dent 20140811324010.4103/1305-7456.126269

16 

CH Kau S Richmond AI Zhurov J Knox I Chestnutt F Hartles Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning systemAm J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 200512844243010.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.037

17 

L. Kovacs A. Zimmermann G. Brockmann H. Baurecht K. Schwenzer-Zimmerer N.A. Papadopulos Accuracy and precision of the three-dimensional assessment of the facial surface using a 3-D laser scannerIEEE Trans Med Imaging 20062567425410.1109/tmi.2006.873624

18 

C H Kau S Richmond Three-Dimensional Imaging for Orthodontics and Maxillofacial SurgeryIowa:Willey-Blackwell2010



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Review Article


Article page

94-97


Authors Details

Lalita Sheoran, Nasir Ul Sadiq, Farhan Hussain, Akshun S Gupta, Syed Tousif Ulla, Zahid Manzoor


Article History

Received : 11-04-2021

Accepted : 05-05-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files