Labio-loop-lingual appliance developed by Dr William Wilson

1975-Dr Craven Kurz who made an important contribution to orthodontics by using a lingual bonded edgewise appliance for the first time. The Kurz lingual bracket evolved further as Ormco 7^th Generation Bracket. 5

1979- Mushroom shaped arch wires and lingual bracket design was developed by Dr Kinya fujita of Kanagawa Dental University, Japan 6

Difficulties encountered with lingual technique

Evolution of lingual brackets7

First generation (1976)

Bite Plane and Rounded Margins

Large Brackets

Advantages of lingual orthodontics

Disadvantages of lingual appliances

Indication for lingual appliances

Ideal Cases 11

Difficult Cases

Anchorage considerations in lingual orthodontics

Bracket Systems

Various Lingual brackets have been developed from the past 25 years and also modifications have been done for patient control, Precise tooth positioning and mechanical efficiency

Figure 1

Conceal Bracket by Thomas Creekmore

The. Arch wire insertion and removal with occlusal approach is better than arch wire insertion with lingually opening slots.13 The opening of the arch wire surface is towards occlusal rather than towards lingual aspect

Figure 2

Fujita lingual Bracket

Fujita Lingual Bracket had a slot that opens towards occlusal. Into the slot the lock pin was inserted mesiodistally into a groove in the slot to hold the arch wire along with elastomers and ligatures. Modifications were made to the brackets and the opening remains occlusal. 14

Figure 3

STB(Scuzzo-Takemoto Bracket)

Development by Dr.Scuzzo and Dr.Takemoto (Sold by Ormco)

The acceptance for the orthodontic treatment is improved greatly with these brackets. The tolerability of the appliance has greatly improved and minimum speech disturbance.

The less complex cases were treated by 2D brackets of forestadent and 3D brackets for more complex cases. These brackets are hardly noticeable for the patient and low profile and manufactured by Forestadent

Figure 4

Stealth Brackets

It is the old generation lingual bracket manufactured by American orthodontics. This bracket has poor rotation control without the use of auxillary. A Vertical slot has been incorporated to attatch an uprighting spring to adjust for the inadequate control caused by a slot that is too short.

Philippe self ligating lingual bracket

Massimo Ronchin in 1994 developed a self ligating lingual bracket which was based on the begg technique.13 The same company had also developed the Phillipe Self Ligating Lingual Bracket which could not control torque but was useful for alignment and leveling. As there is no slots they can be directly bonded to the lingual tooth surface. The first order and second order movements can be anticipated in these type of brackets. A three wing bracket for the attatchment of intermaxillary elastics and application of 3^rd order movements and a narrow single wing bracket for lower incisors, 15

Figure 5

Kelly Bracket: Horizontal insertion bracket

The best in controlling rotations since it is twin with two actual contact points between the bracket and wire. It is a labial unitek bracket adapted as a lingual one and not related to any special technique.

This is best in controlling rotations since there is two actual contact point contact between bracket and wire. It is adapted as a lingual one and not related to any special technique.

Figure 6

Kurz lingual bracket

They are available in 0.022 inch slot. The brackets have rounded facial contours, large hooks which help in power chain and attatchment of springs, increase In the surface area of bracket to help in engaging double overtie. To improve bonding the bracket base is made large and horizontal slot enables easier expression of torque control.

Figure 7

In –ovation l bracket from gac

There is greater inter bracket distance in IN-Ovation bracket which helps in increased patient comfort. The bracket can be placed in the greatest portion of lingual fossa with better adaptation to the anatomical contours. The base pad can be easily bent to adapt to the complicated lingual shape of the cuspid due to the forked design built into the base. There is a self ligating clip incorporated so there is no necessity to change the ligature ties during appointments 16

Braces(Incognito)

The main benefits of this bracket system are lower Profile with less patient discomfort and good finishing.15 The manufacturing methods and design of this bracket system is different completely from the existing appliance. The technology of CAD-CAM appliance has made the process of bracket production and bracket positioning in one unit.

In earlier days due to poor training ,unavailability of bonding set up and no availability of preformed arch wires there was poor finish in lingual orthodontic treated cases. 17

Bonding in lingual orthodontics 18

A key factor for successful correction of a malocclusion with lingual orthodontics is precise and accurate positioning.

Customized lingual appliance set up service system

There exist anatomic discrepancies on the lingual surface of teeth and this is taken care by CLASS Technique. From the duplicate model of the patients ideal occlusion an ideal diagnostic set up is prepared .By using the template as a guide the placement of brackets is done in an ideal configuration. By using the composite adhesive as spacer the brackets are placed on the diagnostic set up before they are next transferred back to malocclusion cast. Once the transfer trays preparation is done an indirect bonding method is used to transfer the brackets clinically.

Figure 8

Torque Angulation Reference Guide (TARG)

The Ormco Company has launched the TARG machine as an important tool to the laboratory technique in 1984. Each tooth has a specific Tip and Torque individually and also it could be placed at a specific distance from the incisal and occlusal surface of the teeth. Now a virtual set up base can be created bonded on the malocclusion set up with attatched resin modified base at the base of each bracket. In 1986 Didier Fillon developed a precise measuring device that was similar to the original TARG machine called as Electronic TARG 19

Figure 9

Bonding with equal specific thickness (BEST) System

A new system was developed by Fillion in 1986.An important aspect was missing in this Original TARG that is the distance from the in the horizontal plane from the labial surface of the tooth to the slot of the lingual bracket. Also the different thickness between the teeth are compensated by adding a precise measuring device to the original TARG machine.

Slot Machine

Thomas Creekmore has designed the slot machine in such a way for placement of both conventional and lingual brackets directly on to the malocclusion model. Each tooth will be designated with specific tip and torque value. The bracket slot is oriented to the machine. The placement of brackets having either horizontal or vertical access arch wire slots is done by the slot machine. There is no requirement of a model tooth set up which is a major benefit. There is difficulty in managing lot of pieces of the slot machine which is a disadvantage.

Figure 10

Lingual BracketJIG (LBJ)

The Lingual Bracket Jig was developed by Geron and the lingual bracket jig helped in direct and indirect positioning of the brackets. In this set up there is a ruler, universal jig for the posterioe teeth and a set of six jigs for the maxillary anterior teeth. The Andrews labial bracket prescription is transferred to the lingual surface by means of jigs. The height of the bracket from the incisal edge is measured using an occlusal stop. Even direct bonding of bracket is done on the lingual surface by using Lingual Bracket Jig.

Transfer Optimized Positioning

(Top/Incognito I Braces system)

Incognito braces are commonly known as lingual braces. They are manufactured using the robotic technology where there is 100% customization of bends in the arch wires and even each bracket is made to confirm to individual surface of each teeth also more effective than aligners. They cabn be used to tret complex malocclusions like spacing, crowding, rotations. The contouring of the bracket base is much smoother and rounder with incognito braces. Dirk Wiechmann fabricated a lingual bracket that adapted to the scanned model²⁰

Figure 11

Korean indirect bonding set up (KIS)

Tae weon kim established the Korean society of lingual Orthodontics and found Model Checker, Bracket Positioner and CRC –Ready made Core trays which together form the Korean Indirect bonding set up System 20

The Korean indirect bonding set up was developed by the Korean society of Lingual Orthodontics. Indirect bonding set up allows positioning of all brackets at once using a bracket positioning machine .A set up model is created and then it is checked for increased precision with a model guage.

Figure 12

HIRO system

HIRO System does not require any special equipment like other systems .It was introduced by Toshiaki Hiro and later improved by Kyoto Takemoto and Giuseppe Scuzzo. The first set up in preparation of the set up model is sectioning of the teeth and aligning. The fabrication of arch form is done by bending a full sized rigid rectangular arch wire and positioning of brackets on it .Now the transfer trays are prepared individually and transferred from he set up.

Figure 13

Preparation of individual transfer trays is done by hard resin in the Convertible resin core system and here the tray and bracket were held together by an elastomeric ligature. Then there is accurate repositioning of the brackets within the resin core system and trays can be reused in case of debonding of brackets. The first bonding session with the unitary trays is of long duration and then this technique would rely on the set up model.

Hybrid Core System

In this system there is mainly transfer of brackets. Matsuno developed the Hybrid Core System which has the favourable properties of silicone and composite resin in the construction of its indirect transfer tray. The bracket is covered by silicone and then by compsite resin during the construction of indirect transfer tray. By doing this combination there is stable positioning of the transfer tray within the mouth and removal of the silicone component from the bonded bracket made easier.

Simplified Technique

In the Simplified technique the STB brackets are placed directly on the lingual surface of teeth by using a bracket placement plier and simple tweezers. The Placement of brackets are done by keeping a distance of 1.5 to 2mm from the incisal edge of anterior teeth. The STB brackets were developed by Giuseppe Scuzzo along with Kyoto Takemoto from Japan fabricated a lingual straight wire bracket and technique known as STB 21

Figure 14

Orapix System

The recent lingual orthodontic laboratory system is the Orapix system. The scanner scans the patient model to a three dimensional data file. The Prepared data file along with the 3-txer software package is sent to the orthodontist via the internet.The orthodontist will create a virtual set up on the computer by using the 3D model.In Once the clinician receives all the details about the patient on the computer screen the orthodontist can decide on the amount of angulation and torque to be given. once this step is done the information is sent back to the laboratory through the internet.

Retention protocol in lingual orthodontics

Fixed Bonded retainer

Begg wrap around retainer

Hawley retainer