IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research

Print ISSN: 2581-9356

Online ISSN: 2581-9364

CODEN : IIJOCV

IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research (IJODR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

176-181


Authors Details

Patil B C, Harshvardhan Reddy, Akash Kencha*, Spoorthy Obalapura, Vishwanath Patil


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1724

PDF Downloaded: 702


Comparing the accuracy of direct versus a new technique of indirect bracket placement- A clinical trial


Original Article

Author Details : Patil B C, Harshvardhan Reddy, Akash Kencha*, Spoorthy Obalapura, Vishwanath Patil

Volume : 4, Issue : 4, Year : 2018

Article Page : 176-181

https://doi.org/10.18231/2455-6785.2018.0035



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: Aim of the study was to compare the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and new indirect bonding technique in following aspects: (a) occluso-gingival bracket position (vertical) (b) mesio-distal bracket position (horizontal), (c) Angulation of brackets.
Materials and Methods: 10 patients were bonded with split-mouth approach. For each patient, two randomly selected opposite quadrants were used as indirect bonding quadrant and the other two as direct bonding quadrant drawing 20 samples. The occluso-gingival, mesio-distal bracket position accuracy in both direct and the new indirect bonding technique were measured using digital caliper and the angulations of brackets were measured with the help of photographs and surface protractor software.
Results: results showed statistical difference between direct and a new indirect bonding technique. Proving indirect bonding is more accurate than the direct bonding of braces.
Conclusion: There is difference between mean bracket placement errors for direct and indirect methods, the range of errors in the three directions assessed were greater for direct than indirect bracket placement. The magnitudes of the findings are of clinical relevance.

Keywords: Direct bonding, Indirect bonding, Surface protractor software.

 


How to cite : Patil B C, Reddy H , Kencha A , Obalapura S , Patil V, Comparing the accuracy of direct versus a new technique of indirect bracket placement- A clinical trial. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 2018;4(4):176-181

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.