Print ISSN: 2581-9356
Online ISSN: 2581-9364
CODEN : IIJOCV
IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research (IJODR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the more...Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 4, Issue : 1, Year : 2018
Article Page : 29-34
https://doi.org/10.18231/2455-6785.2018.0006
Abstract
Introduction: Successful orthodontic treatment outcome depends on an accurate diagnosis along with clinical management of vertical and transverse discrepancies. Thus, this study is carried out to evaluate dental arch and alveolar width along with buccolingual inclination of maxillomandibular teeth in different malocclusions.
Materials and Methods: Based on the Angle’s classification of malocclusion, 140 study models were selected and four separate groups were formed- normal occlusion, Class I malocclusion, Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 respectively. Maxillomandibular arch and alveolar widths at canines, 1st and 2nd premolars and first molars were measured. Buccolingual inclination of posterior teeth were measured. Lateral cephalogram of all the sample subjects was taken to calculate SNA, SNB, ANB angle, Wits Appraisal and McNamara Differential. Oneway Anova test was performed.
Results: Maxillary intercanine, interpremolars, intermolar and maxillary dentoalveolar width is more in normal occlusion when compared with Class I, Class II division 1 and Class II division 2 malocclusions. Class II division 1 has narrower intercanine and interpremolar width with similar intermolar width as compared to Class II division 2. For transverse discrepancy buccolingual inclination is fundamental.
Conclusion: Class II division 2 has a smaller arch width and Class II division 1 shows a significantly larger arch width than Class I malocclusions.
Keywords: Arch width, Alveolar width and Buccolingual inclination.
How to cite : Raurale S, Manerikar R, Durkar S, Deshmukh S, Rahalkar J, Comparative evaluation of transverse discrepancies in different sagittal malocclusions-An observational study. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 2018;4(1):29-34
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.