IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research

Print ISSN: 2581-9356

Online ISSN: 2581-9364

CODEN : IIJOCV

IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research (IJODR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2015 and is published under the Khyati Education and Research Foundation (KERF), is registered as a non-profit society (under the society registration act, 1860), Government of India with the vision of various accredited vocational courses in healthcare, education, paramedical, yoga, publication, teaching and research activity, with the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing the more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

107-113


Authors Details

Priyanka Agarwal, Rohit Kulshrestha


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 1559

PDF Downloaded: 798


Comparison of accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques –An in-vivo study


Original Article

Author Details : Priyanka Agarwal, Rohit Kulshrestha

Volume : 3, Issue : 2, Year : 2017

Article Page : 107-113


Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and a new indirect bonding technique.
Material and Methods: 25 patients requiring upper and lower pre–adjusted edgewise appliances were taken for the study and subjected to a split mouth system of allocation of bracket bonding. The labial aspect of the dentition of each patient were divided into upper and lower segment drawing 50 samples from 25 patients. In each segment, half of the quadrant was bonded with direct bonding technique and the other half of the quadrant was bonded by the new technique of indirect bonding randomly. Bracket placement accuracy was measured in 3 ways, inciso-gingival, mesio-distal and angular measurement.
Results: Central Incisor Group: The inciso-gingival and mesio-distal parameter showed a minor statistical significance (p< 0.005) whereas the variation in the group of Angular measurements was comparatively higher (p<0.002). Lateral Incisor Group: The inciso-gingival and mesio-distal parameter showed a minor statistical significance (p<0.005) whereas the variation in the group of Angular measurements was comparatively higher (p< 0.001). Canine Group: The inciso-gingival and mesio-distal parameter showed a minor statistical significance (p<0.005) and (p<0.004) respectively whereas the variation in the group of Angular measurements was comparatively higher (p<0.001). Overall, in all three groups, though there was a statistical difference, it was very minor (fraction of millimetre), however comparatively large error was found in angular measurements.
Conclusion: Indirect bonding is more accurate than direct bonding in following aspects: vertical, horizontal and in angulation. The magnitudes of the findings are of clinical relevance.

Keywords: Indirect bonding, Bracket placement, Transfer tray


How to cite : Agarwal P, Kulshrestha R, Comparison of accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding techniques –An in-vivo study. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 2017;3(2):107-113

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.