- Visibility 19 Views
- Downloads 25 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijodr.35832.1760500208
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Analysis of facial asymmetry in various facial forms
Introduction: Facial symmetry refers to the balanced size, shape, and position of facial components, though perfect symmetry rarely exists. Minor asymmetries, often with the left side larger than the right, are common and may result from developmental, functional, traumatic, or pathological factors.
Aim: Analysis and evaluation of facial asymmetry in different facial forms.
Materials and Methods: Seventy-five subjects aged 15–35 years from the Department of Orthodontics, Mithila Minority Dental College, were categorized into Euryprosopic, Mesoprosopic, and Leptoprosopic groups.The photographs were cropped by using Adobe photoshop and analysis was done by Digimizer software. The photographs were analysed for 5 horizontal and 3 midline parameters. ANOVA test was performed to analyse the significant difference (at P ≤ 0.05).
Results: Significant differences were found in both vertical and horizontal facial parameters among the three facial types, with Leptoprosopic individuals showing the highest values. However, no significant asymmetry was observed between the right and left sides in any group.
Conclusion: Distinct vertical and horizontal facial proportions were observed across facial types, especially in Leptoprosopic individuals. Despite these variations, facial symmetry was maintained across all groups, supporting its relevance in orthodontics and facial reconstruction.
References
- Choi KY. Analysis of facial asymmetry. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2015;16(1):1–10.
- Anshu Agarwal, Tikku T, Maurya RP, Srivastava K, Khanna R, Sneh L, et al. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in subjects with Class I and Class II molar relation. Sch J Dent Sci.2018;5(5):315-321.
- Lu SM, Bartlett SP. On facial asymmetry and self-perception. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):873e–81e. doi: 10.1097/ PRS.0000000000000211.
- Missier MS, George AMG. Estimating the prevalence of facial asymmetry in the South Indian population. Sch J Dent Sci. 2021;8(1):14–18. doi:10.36347/sjds.2021.v08i01.003
[Google Scholar] - Williams RP, Rinchuse DJ, Zullo TG. Perceptions of midline deviations among different facial types. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;145(2):249–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.034
[Google Scholar] - Lee MS, Chung DH, Lee JW, Cha KS. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/j
[Google Scholar] ajodo.2008.08.029. - Kumar SS, Subrahmanya RM. Facial asymmetry in skeletal Class II malocclusions. RRJDS. 2014;2(1):79–86.
- Farkas LG, Cheung G. Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. Angle Orthod. 1981;51(1):70–7. doi:
- 1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0070:FAIHNA>2.0.CO;2.
- Shyagali TR. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. J Orthod Res. 2014;2(2):79–84. doi: 10.4103/2321-3825.131118
[Google Scholar] - Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 1991;61(1):43–8. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061
[Google Scholar]<0043:SAIEPF>2.0.CO;2. - Ercan I, Ozdemir ST, Etoz A , Sigirli D, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, et al. Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis. J Anat. 2008;213(6):663–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-
[Google Scholar] - 01002.x.
- Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G. Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(11):1126–32. doi: 10.1016/0278-
[Google Scholar] 2391(94)90528-2. - Haraguchi S, Iguchi Y, Takada K. Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(3):421–426. doi: 10.2319/022107-85.1
[Google Scholar] - Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod. 1978;48(2):141-8. doi:
- 1043/0003-3219(1978)048<0141:AAOAIT>2.0.CO;2.
- Shaner DJ, Peterson AE, Beattie OB, Bamforth JS. Assessment of soft tissue facial asymmetry in medically normal and syndrome- affected individuals. Am J Med Genet. 2000;93:143–54.
- Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, Tartaglia G. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993;103(4):327–37. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70013-E
[Google Scholar] - Song WC, Koh KS, Kim SH, Hu KS, Kim HJ, Park JC, et al. Horizontal Angular Asymmetry of the Face in Korean Young Adults with reference to the eye and mouth. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(11):2164–8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.018
[Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Bhagat A, Dubey N, Hasan M, Roy AS, Kumar V, Raj P. Analysis of facial asymmetry in various facial forms [Internet]. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 18];11(3):197–204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.35832.1760500208
APA
Bhagat, A., Dubey, N., Hasan, M., Roy, A. S., Kumar, V., Raj, P. (2025). Analysis of facial asymmetry in various facial forms. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res, 11(3), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.35832.1760500208
MLA
Bhagat, Archana, Dubey, Nitu, Hasan, Mehedi, Roy, Abhishek Singha, Kumar, Vikas, Raj, Priyanka. "Analysis of facial asymmetry in various facial forms." IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res, vol. 11, no. 3, 2025, pp. 197–204. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.35832.1760500208
Chicago
Bhagat, A., Dubey, N., Hasan, M., Roy, A. S., Kumar, V., Raj, P.. "Analysis of facial asymmetry in various facial forms." IP Indian J Orthod Dentofacial Res 11, no. 3 (2025): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.35832.1760500208